Most pre-, mid-, and post-election commentary is crap. Not that I know any better, but I don't get paid to sit around and think about elections all day.
In contrast to all the crap, I found this commentary by David Brooks to be a very plausible and well-reasoned discussion of the Iowa results. (This is the NYT version; I read the Strib reprint which for no apparent reason has a different title.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
See, this is exactly why you should post more. How else would I have found this? (Well, besides reading the Opinion section on a regular basis myself.)
Post a Comment